载药微球概论 载药微球体外实验 载药微球药代动力学研究 载药微球试验病理研究 载药微球临床病理研究 载药微球技术上的考虑 载药微球安全性研究 载药微球临床试验研究 载药微球的并发症载药微球的未来 关于载药微球的争论 HepaSphere Microspheres DC-Bead 载药微球的结语
返回首页

载药微球的未来

时间:2015-12-14 03:15来源:未知 作者:Mr.Editor
1. 载药微球-顺铂 ioxaglic and iohexol contrast the elution profile was similar with cisplatin fractions of 15%,40%,70% and 95% at 1,3,6 and 24 hours respectively 2. 奥沙利铂 Conducted a preclinical study in vitro In vivo in patients with C
1. 载药微球-顺铂



   
   
ioxaglic and iohexol contrast the elution profile was similar with cisplatin fractions of  15%,40%,70% and 95% at 1,3,6 and 24 hours
respectively



2. 奥沙利铂



   

• Conducted a preclinical study in vitro
• In vivo in patients with CRC measuring oxaliplatin concentration in target lesion (by biopsy) and plasma
• Highest of drug tested was 400mg oxaliplatin/50mg HepaSphere
• Working dose : 50mg oxaliplatin + 1 vial of Hepa 50-100 for 15min


3. 伊立替康- HepaSphere 


文献


    N= line 药物 栓塞剂 ORR(%) PFSV(月) mOSV(月)
Tellez【1】 98 30 SL C/D/M collagen n.r. N.R. 9
Leichman【2】 99 31 FL C/D/M collagen 29 8 14
Salman【3】 02 24 SL FU/INF PVA 21 N.R. 11
Muller 03 66 FSL FU/Mel IO/GF 43 8 8
Hong 09 21 FSL C/D/M PVA N.R. N.R. 8
Vogl 09 463 SL M/Gem/I IO/DSM 15^ N.R. 14
Albert 10 121 SL C/D/M IO/PVA 2* 3 9

C= Cisplatin; D=Doxorubicin; M=Mitomycin C; FU=5-FU; INF=Interferon; Mel=Melphalan; Gem= Gemcitabin, I=Irinotecan

* RECIST

      这些历史上TACE的文献比较历史上HAI文献,局部的ORR并没有得到改善。在二线治疗(SL)中与静脉化疗没有比较研究。有人指出“结直肠癌肝转移TACE的研究并没有成熟”【4】。



常规TACE,微粒150-250μm,部分肿瘤坏死,但没有消融
术前 术前
术后 术后

DEB-TACE 伊立替康(Irinotecan-eluting HepaSphere)药物洗脱微球® 完全坏死=化学消融(chemoablation)
术前 术前


栓塞前后50mg HepaSphere+伊立替康200mg 白色的造影剂滞留用了1天吸收。

        Chemoembolization of hepatic metastases using drug eluting microparticles has the potential of Chemoablation.



Which microparticles do we have? 我们有哪些微粒?

DC-BEADS HepaSphere Tandem
polyvinyl alcohol sodium acrylate polyvinyl alcohol
70-150μm..500-700μm 30-200 (x 4) ) μm 40μm, 75μm, 100μm
200 mg Irinotecan/4 ml 200 mg Irinotecan/50mg 200 mg Irinotecan/4ml
Biocompatibles Biosphere Celonova


Evidence from Literature【5】


拯救化疗,前瞻性研究, 29例病人71次TACE

治疗计划
Patients/TACE 29/71 Nausea, Pain & Flush Management During and after TACE
• 100-200 mg Irinotecan loaded
in 50-100 mg (50-150um) HepaSphere®
• 20 min loading time
• sel. injection via 3 F micro-cath.
• Endpoint: stopflow
• 100-200 mg Irinotecan loaded
in 50-100 mg (50-150um) HepaSphere®
• 20 min loading time
• sel. injection via 3 F micro-cath.
• Endpoint: stopflow
• Atropin 0.5 mg i.v.
• Continuous injection (1-5 cc/h):
- Morphine 50 mg/50cc
- Metamizol 5 mg/50cc
- 50 cc saline


endpoint:stopflow
   


局部反应
 

Can we predict local response?


Uptake of CM/MP(造影剂/微球的吸收)
     


   
   



Uptake of contrast day +1
Uptake Microparticles/C (+1d)
mean grade 1.8 CT
Grade 0 18%  
Grade 1 18%
Grade 2 43%
Grade 3 11%
Grade 4 10%

Uptake grade 3 (HepaSphere 50mg, Irinotecan 200mg)
  7.6cm 1月11日
  4.9cm 8月11日


Uptake grade 0-1

   
   

Uptake predicts local response(HepaSphere™ 100 mg,Irinotecan 400 mg)
     




TTP and Survival
Median overall survival after 1. TACE: 8 months
Median time to progression after 1. TACE: 5 months


Side effects

• 30天死亡率 0%(mortality 0%)
• 腹痛 (Abdominal pain),严重(severe) 32%, 中度(moderate) 40%, 轻度(mild) 28%
• 恶心/呕吐(Nausea/vomiting,ECOG-grading)gade 3 in 12%, grade 2 in 43%, grade 1 in 45%
• 动脉性高压(Arterial hypertension)in 22/71 TACE (31%)  syst. RR increased more than 50 mmHg

Can we predict outcome?

Predictors of good outcome
 
• < 25% 肝脏受累(liver involvement)

LTV <25%
• 多血管实质肿瘤(solid tumors with hypervascularization)

 
• 转移灶内造影剂吸收强度(intense uptake of CM within metastases)

 
• TACE术后转移灶完全坏死(complete necrosis of mts. after TACE)

 
• 较短的治疗间隔 (short treatment intervals)



病例介绍1:拯救性化疗
术前 多血管
术前 术后栓塞强度高


术后3个月
完全坏死  


首次术后4年
   

TACE with Positive Predictors:
 
  • limited size (<10 cm)
  • hypervascular lesions
  • intense uptake

TACE with Negative Predictors:
 
  • hugh tumors
  • low vascular
  • minimal uptake
  • incomplete necrosis
病理介绍2:拯救性化疗
术前  
   


术后一个月,不完全坏死 术后4个月








1. Tellez C, Benson AB 3rd, Lyster MT, Talamonti M, Shaw J, Braun MA, Nemcek AA Jr, Vogelzang RL. Phase II trial of chemoembolization for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver and review of the literature. Cancer. 1998 Apr 1;82(7):1250-9. Review.

2. Leichman CG, Jacobson JR, Modiano M, Daniels JR, Zalupski MM, Doroshow JH, Fletcher WS, Macdonald JS. Hepatic chemoembolization combined with systemic infusion of 5-fluorouracil and bolus leucovorin for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: A Southwest Oncology Group pilot trial. Cancer. 1999 Sep 1;86(5):775-81

3. Salman HS, Cynamon J, Jagust M, Bakal C, Rozenblit A, Kaleya R, Negassa A, Wadler S. Randomized phase II trial of embolization therapy versus chemoembolization therapy in previously treated patients with colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2002 Nov;2(3):173-9.

4. Pwint TP, Midgley R, Kerr DJ. Regional hepatic chemotherapies in the treatment of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver. Semin Oncol. 2010 Apr;37(2):149-59. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.03.005.

5. 
Huppert P, Wenzel T, Wietholtz H. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) of colorectal cancer liver metastases by irinotecan-eluting microspheres in a salvage patient population. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Feb;37(1):154-64. 
顶一下
(0)
0%
踩一下
(0)
0%
------分隔线----------------------------
  • 上一篇:没有了
  • 下一篇:没有了
推荐内容
热点内容