概论 关于适应症技术上的考虑
返回首页

急性坏死性胰腺炎经皮引流技术上考虑

时间:2017-06-17 08:42来源:未知 作者:Mr.Editor
粗管

急性坏死性胰腺炎的周围积液(Collections associated with Acute Pancreatitis)包括:

1. 急性胰腺炎周围积液(Acute Peripancreatic Fluid Collection)
2. 急性胰腺脓肿(Acute Pancreatic Abscess)
3. 急性胰腺炎囊肿(Acute Pseudocyst)

另一种更为具体的分类

与经皮引流有关的SAP局部并发症的演变
并发症 病理 演变
急性液体积聚              
发生于胰腺炎病程的早中期,位于胰周,无囊壁包裹的液体积聚
急性液体积聚多会自行吸收,少数可发展为急性假性囊肿或胰腺脓肿
胰腺及胰周组织坏死 指胰腺实质的弥漫性或局灶性坏死或胰周脂肪坏死
无菌性坏死可能液化、机化、吸收、包裹,也可继发感染,感染性坏死和蔓延 
无菌性坏死组织包裹 指胰腺实质的弥漫性或局灶性坏死或胰周脂肪坏死液化、机化、吸收、包裹 可吸收或继发感染性坏死和蔓延
胰周感染 
胰腺周围的包裹性积脓 
包裹较好,界限清楚,液化较完全是区别于感染性坏死的特点 
胰腺脓肿 
胰腺坏死和感染
可吸收或蔓延


急性液体的积聚

    • 发生大约40%的病例(Occur in 40% of cases of Acute Pancreatitis)
    • 主要在胰腺周围(Located near pancreas)
    • 没有肉芽组织形成的壁(Lack a wall of granulation tissue)
    • 最初通常是无菌的(Usually sterile initially)
    • 持续4~6周(Persist 4-6 weeks)
    • 50% 的自发性回归(regress spontaneously)
 
目前国际上公认的临床实践是保守治疗( Current internationally accepted clinical practice is for conservative management),这些治疗的适应症包括:(Indications to treat can include)
 
      • 感染(Infection)
      • 疼痛(Pain)
      • 液体聚积不断增加(Increasing size) 
      • 胆道梗阻(Biliary obstruction)

引流急性胰腺炎的无菌性液体积聚有证据吗?(Draining sterile fluid collections in Acute Pancreatitis. Any evidence?)
 
        • 随机试验(Randomised study)的研究发表在 (Surg Endosc 2011,Zerem et al)


病例数 分组 研究终点:
转为更侵入治疗(非临床结果)
A组=20 保守治疗 11需要进一步治疗,8例需要导管引流
B组=20 初始导管引流 3例需要外科手术(其中11例感染,1例致命)
作者结论:导管治疗比保守治疗更有效
 
但是B组20例病人中的11例因为导管引流发生感染,包括1例致命;so by definition ALL of Group B were de novo converted to a more aggressive management strategy
所以尽管作者有其结论,但事实上这项研究并不支持急性胰腺炎的无菌聚集液体的经皮引流
Walser较早的研究报告指出无菌聚集液体的经皮引流,感染率(contamination)为59%(CVIR 2006)


急性假性囊肿(Acute Pseudocyst)


• 富含淀粉酶的液体由纤维组织壁或肉芽组织所包裹(Collection of amylase-rich pancreatic fluid enclosed by a wall of fibrotic tissue or granulation tissue)
• 一般发生在胰腺炎发病后6周(Generally occurs 6 weeks after the acute event)
• 并非所有的假性囊肿都需要引流(Not all require drainage)
• 适应症包括(Indications include)
 
           • 感染 Infection
           • 痛疼 Pain
           • 增大 Enlargement
           • 胆道梗阻 Biliary obstruction
 
• 和主胰管的交通是重要的预后因素,因此目前推荐引流前先行ERCP(Banks et al 2011)
    Communication with the Main Pancreatic Duct is an important prognostic indicator therefore current state-of-the-art recommendation is for ERCP prior to drainage (Banks et al 2011)
 
• 和正常主胰管有交通意味着可能延长引流的时间,但最终会成功
       Communication with a normal MPD indicates likely prolonged drainage but ultimate success
 
• 和阻塞的主胰管交通,意味着单纯假性胰腺囊肿的引流很可能失败
      Communication with an obstructed MPD indicates likely failure of catheter drainage alone

急性胰腺脓肿(Acute Pancreatic Abscess)- 最新亚特兰大(2011)共识已经取消胰腺脓肿的名词,编者认为其很难和感染坏死的液体区分。

 
    • 邻近胰腺的边界清楚的脓液聚积(A well defined collection of pus usually adjacent to the pancreas)
    • 可以包括感染性的假性胰腺囊肿(Can include infected pseudocysts)
    • 通常发生在急性胰腺炎发作后3-6周(Generally occur 3-6 weeks after the acute episode)
    • 与感染性胰腺坏死相区别的要点是内容物为液化,和有或没有胰腺的坏死组织
          Differentiated from Infected Pancreatic Necrosis pathologically in that the contents are liquifactive and contain little or no necrotic pancreatic tissue
    • 常需要长期的导管引流,如数周或数月
         Often require multiple catheters over a very prolonged period ie weeks-months
    • 经皮引流的成功率65-90% 

胰腺坏死感染


感染的诊断(Diagnosing Infection)
 
• 怀疑胰腺感染应该影像引导下抽吸因为(Suspected infection of a pancreatic collection should be dx by percutaneous image-guided aspiration as:)
       • 样本错误率低(虽然有一项研究显示假阴性10%) Sampling error is low (although a false negative rate of 10% reported in one series)
       • 临床和实验室感染证据,C反应蛋白和WBC 升高,发热(Clinical and Lab indicators of infection - elevated WCC, CRP, fevers - all common in Acute Pancreatitis even without infection so on their own are poor indicators)
• Multiorgan failure - suggestive but not specific nor sensitive for
infection
• No reliable imaging parameters
• 50% of patients do not present in an overtly clinically septic
manner
Step-up Approach

目标:控制感染来源,而不是完全清除坏死组织
           the step-up approach aims at control of the source of infection, rather than complete removal of the infected necrotic tissue. T
第一步:经皮或内窥镜引流被感染的积液以控制败血症,这一步骤可以推迟,甚至避免外科坏死物质清除术【1-3】。
          The first step is percutaneous or endoscopic drainage of the collection of infected fluid to mitigate sepsis; this step may postpone or even obviate surgical necrosectomy.
第二部:如果引流没有导致临床改善,第二部是微创腹膜后坏死组织切除【
          If drainage does not lead to clinical improvement, the next step is minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy.

         The step-up approach may reduce the rates of complications and death by minimizing surgical trauma (i.e., tissue damage and a systemic proinflammatory response) in already critically ill patients.

粗管

   


多管


1. Freeny PC, Hauptmann E, Althaus SJ, Traverso LW, Sinanan M. Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:969-975

2. Baril NB, Ralls PW, Wren SM, et al. Does an infected peripancreatic fluid collection or abscess mandate operation? Ann Surg 2000;231:361-367

3. 
Papachristou GI, Takahashi N, Chahal P, Sarr MG, Baron TH. Peroral endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Ann Surg 2007;245:943-951
顶一下
(0)
0%
踩一下
(0)
0%
------分隔线----------------------------
  • 上一篇:没有了
  • 下一篇:没有了
推荐内容